Overview
Justin Nelson is the go-to lawyer for high-stakes litigation. Justin’s practice centers on taking cases to trial, arguing key motions leading up to trial or the appeal, and positioning the case for victory. He brings an unparalleled combination of trial and appellate excellence. In 2024, he was nominated for Litigator of the Year by the American Lawyer.
Justin represented Dominion Voting Systems in its litigation against Fox, culminating in April 2023 with a $787.5 million settlement—an amount that represented “vindication and accountability,” as Justin stated. Watch the video here.
“Justin Nelson has always had a reputation as a ‘go to’ lawyer in high stakes litigation but his major win in the defamation claim against Fox News has just elevated the ‘go to’ to ‘must have.”
LawFuel, “Who is Justin Nelson – The Star Lawyer Who Took Fox News To Task”
“Justin is an amazing lawyer. He has it all. In court he’s a sight to behold. His command of the law and facts is masterful.”
Anthony C. Lame, CEO of Green Mountain Glass
“Justin is a giant slayer. He wins. It is so impressive to watch him in action. Smart, dedicated. He fights hard for you and he does it with a smile. He’s exactly what you want from a lawyer.”
Ruben Bonet, CEO of Fractus
“Since Justin Nelson began appearing, the court “has granted Nelson almost everything he has asked for.”
The American Lawyer, click here for the full article
The Court in Dominion v. Fox publicly noted at the time of the settlement that “this is the best lawyering I’ve had, ever.” Justin took the deposition of Rupert Murdoch, among other key witnesses. A CNN legal commentator stated about that deposition: “I’ve never seen anything like these admissions. This is one of the most damaging depositions I’ve ever seen in my thirty years practicing law.”
Justin also is at the forefront of Artificial Intelligence litigation. Justin is co-lead counsel in a proposed class action representing book authors against Open AI and Microsoft alleging copyright infringement regarding those companies’ artificial intelligence systems. Those cases, Alter et al. v. Open AI and Microsoft and Authors Guild et al. v. Open AI and Microsoft, are pending in the Southern District of New York. In addition, Justin represents book authors in a proposed class action against Anthropic that alleges Anthropic committed copyright infringement in its artificial intelligence systems. Justin has a number of other cases regarding artificial intelligence, including other copyright matters along with patent litigation.
Justin’s practice spans across other complex cases as well, from antitrust to bankruptcy to contractual disputes to fraud to patent litigation to trade secret theft. Justin is currently representing small businesses in taxpayer litigation against the IRS for unlawfully withholding employee retention credits. A recent Bloomberg News article featured Justin discussing the litigation.
Among other cases, Justin was lead counsel for Green Mountain when it obtained a $64.5 million judgment against Ardagh in the Federal District Court of Delaware—a verdict upheld on appeal and was included on National Law Journal’s Top 100 Verdicts of the Year list.
Justin won a $38 million judgment for repeat client, Fractus, (a case that later settled on appeal) and has led a strategy that has resulted in Fractus recovering over $100 million.
High Profile Litigation
Dominion v. Fox was one of a number of high-profile cases for Mr. Nelson. In Dominion v. Fox, the summary judgment briefing in the case earned widespread praise from the legal community and the broader public alike. Justin also represented a number of plaintiffs against a major car rental company that resulted in victories in court and ultimately a settlement.
In 2020, Justin represented various governmental actors regarding the 2020 election. His clients included entities with both Republican and Democratic control. Among his clients, Justin represented the Arizona Secretary of State in Bowyer v. Ducey and argued the successful motion to dismiss regarding the false allegations of election fraud. Justin also successfully represented the Governor of Wisconsin in a series of litigations related to the 2020 election. Justin also represented a number of plaintiffs against a major car company that allegedly falsely reported its clients to the police for car theft. That case resulted in a combined nine-figure settlement across the hundreds of plaintiffs who had been injured by the false reports. The artificial intelligence cases and the ERC cases also have generated substantial attention given their intersection of law and policy—an area where Justin often litigates.
Recognition
The legal industry has taken note of Justin’s litigation talents. In June 2024, he was named one of Hollywood’s Top 100 Lawyers by the Hollywood Reporter. In 2010, American Lawyer wrote about how Justin fought off efforts from large banks to ram through a plan that would have disadvantaged individuals in the multi-billion Washington Mutual bankruptcy. He’s also repeatedly been named a “Super Lawyer” by Thomson Reuters, among other recognitions.
Background & Commitment to the Legal Industry
Justin is a former law clerk to Justice Sandra Day O’Connor at the United States Supreme Court and for Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Justin has represented various parties as amici in the Supreme Court of the United States, in cases ranging from intellectual property to antitrust to election law. He has practiced First Amendment law on behalf of various media companies.
Justin is one of the very few lawyers who have both clerked for the United States Supreme Court and also served as lead trial counsel in a verdict of over $50 million.
Justin also has taught Advanced Constitutional Law on the Law of the Political Process and has served as the Chair of the Economics of the Profession Committee in the American Bar Association’s Intellectual Property Division. He is a Fellow of the American Bar Association and the Texas Bar Association. Justin also currently teaches Legislation & Statutory Interpretation as an adjunct professor at The University of Texas School of Law, a class that covers a wide range of issues from public policy to statutes to criminal law to Constitutional law and the First Amendment.
In addition to his legal writings, Justin’s article on Lyndon Johnson’s role at the 1968 Democratic Convention appeared in the Presidential Studies Quarterly.
Justin is a member of Susman Godfrey’s Executive Committee.
